Hire Developers Who Build Fast With AI Tools

It refers to development workflows that lean heavily on AI coding assistants for speed — generating scaffolding, boilerplate, tests, and first-draft implementations rather than typing everything by hand. Our developers pair that speed with the engineering judgement to know when the AI output is right, when it is subtly wrong, and when to throw it away and write it themselves. Neither half alone is what we sell.

On two axes, deliberately kept separate. A live coding evaluation tests fundamental engineering judgement the way any serious technical interview would — debugging, design reasoning, code review. A second evaluation looks specifically at AI-assisted work: how they prompt, how they review what comes back, and whether they catch the kind of confident-but-wrong code AI tools produce. A developer has to clear both, not average them.

Not stack-specific. The marketplace covers full-stack, frontend and backend developers across common languages and frameworks. What every developer shares is the AI-assisted workflow and the judgement to use it well, not a single technology. Tell us your stack when you share a project and we match against it.

Yes — project-based, fixed-scope hiring is one of our most common engagement types, alongside part-time and full-time augmentation. There is no minimum commitment and no requirement to convert a project into an ongoing engagement.

We replace them at no extra cost inside the first two weeks. A mismatch is usually visible early, which is why the window exists. Tell us specifically what was wrong — pace, communication, the quality of their AI-assisted output — because that is what makes the replacement better rather than just different.